Showing posts with label euro ncap crash test. Show all posts
Showing posts with label euro ncap crash test. Show all posts

12/04/2019

2020 SEAT Alhambra and 2020 Jeep Renegade - Crash Safety Tests Results

Crash Safety Tests

The passenger compartment 2020 SEAT Alhambra remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.



A similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

Crash Safety Tests

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good for the driver.

However, for the rear passenger, dummy readings indicated a marginal level of protection for the chest.

A penalty was also applied as a result of high shoulder belt forces and protection of the chest was rated as poor.

In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected and the car scored maximum points in this test.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good.

However, the side door of the car became detached during the test and the score was penalised for the risk of occupant ejection.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed adequately in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur

2020 Jeep Renegade - Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Jeep Renegade remained stable in the frontal offset test.

Crash Safety Tests

Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger.

Jeep showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver's neck and that of the rear passenger's chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of tensile forces and rib compression respectively.

Otherwise, protection was good or adequate. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good and the car scored maximum points in this test.

In the more severe side pole impact, readings of rib compression indicated marginal chest protection, with good protection of other body areas.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.

An autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system is available on the 2020 Jeep Renegade. However, as this is an option, it was not tested as part of this assessment.

2020 Peugeot 2008 and 2020 Volkswagen Sharan - Crash Safety Tests Results

Crash Safety Tests

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Peugeot 2008 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.



Peugeot showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

Crash Safety Tests

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was rated as marginal for the neck of the driver and for the chest of both occupants.

In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in test.

In the more severe side pole test, chest protection was rated as adequate and that of other body areas as good.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The 2020 Peugeot 2008 has an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system as standard equipment.

In tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur, the system performed well.

2020 Volkswagen Sharan - Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Volkswagen Sharan remained stable in the frontal offset test.

Crash Safety Tests

Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Volkswagen showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good for the driver.

However, for the rear passenger, dummy readings indicated a marginal level of protection for the chest.

A penalty was also applied as a result of high shoulder belt forces and protection of the chest was rated as poor.

In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected and the 2020 Volkswagen Sharan scored maximum points in this test.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good.

However, the side door of the Sharan became detached during the test and the score was penalised for the risk of occupant ejection.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed adequately in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur.

2020 Subaru Forester and 2020 Å koda Octavia - Crash Safety Tests Results

Crash Safety Tests

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Subaru Forester remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.



Subaru showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

Crash Safety Tests

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both occupants, with the exception of the chest of the rear passenger, for which readings of compression indicated marginal protection.

In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in all test scenarios.

2020 Å koda Octavia - Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Å koda Octavia remained stable in the frontal offset test.

Crash Safety Tests

Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Å koda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger was marginal but, otherwise, protection was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger.

In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this test.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compression, with good protection of other parts of the body.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur

2020 Audi Q7 and 2020 Renault Captur - Crash Safety Tests Results

Crash Safety Tests

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Audi Q7 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees
and femurs of both the driver and passenger.



Audi showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the chest was marginal for both driver and passenger.

Crash Safety Tests

In the full-width rigid barrier test, chest protection was again marginal for the rear passenger but other critical body areas were well or adequately protected, for both occupants.

In both the side barrier test and the pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the Audi Q7 scored maximum points in these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the front seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality against other vehicles at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in almost all test scenarios.

2020 Renault Captur Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the Renault Captur remained stable in the frontal offset test.

Crash Safety Tests

Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

Protection was rated as good for all critical body areas for the passenger.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was good or adequate for all critical body areas, both for the driver and the rear passenger.

In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this test.

Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.

2020 Tesla Model X and 2020 Porsche Taycan - Crash Safety Tests Results

Crash Safety Tests

The stand-out performer of this round is undoubtedly Tesla’s Model X, scoring 94 percent for Safety Assist, the same as the Model 3 scored early this year.



The passenger compartment of the Model X remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the
knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Crash Safety Tests

Tesla showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection was rated as good for all critical body areas for the driver.

This was also the casein the the full-width rigid barrier test, and protection was good or adequate for the rear passenger. In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in all test scenarios.

2020 Porsche Taycan Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the Taycan remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the
knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Crash Safety Tests

Porsche showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both occupants, with the exception of the rear passenger's chest, for which dummy readings of compression indicated a marginal level of protection.

In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this tests.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated marginal whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur. However, the Taycan was not awarded the points for these tests as good dynamic performance in the front seats is a prerequisite for AEB scoring.

2020 Ford Mondeo and 2020 Ford Kuga - Crash Safety Tests Results

Crash Safety Tests

The passenger compartment of the Mondeo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.



Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger.

Crash Safety Tests

In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur.

2020 Ford Kuga crash tests results

The passenger compartment of the Kuga remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the
knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Crash Safety Tests

Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver's chest and lower leg was rated as marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection the driver's chest was again marginal but that of all other critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger.

Crash Safety Tests

In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many
whiplash injuries occur