2020 SEAT Alhambra and 2020 Jeep Renegade - Crash Safety Tests Results

2020 SEAT Alhambra and 2020 Jeep Renegade - Crash Safety Tests Results

videos   12/04/2019 01:52:00 PM

The passenger compartment 2020 SEAT Alhambra remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

A similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good for the driver.

However, for the rear passenger, dummy readings indicated a marginal level of protection for the chest.

A penalty was also applied as a result of high shoulder belt forces and protection of the chest was rated as poor.

In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected and the car scored maximum points in this test.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good.

However, the side door of the car became detached during the test and the score was penalised for the risk of occupant ejection.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed adequately in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur

2020 Jeep Renegade - Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Jeep Renegade remained stable in the frontal offset test.

Dummy readings showed good protection of the knees and femurs of both the driver and passenger.

Jeep showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the driver's neck and that of the rear passenger's chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of tensile forces and rib compression respectively.

Otherwise, protection was good or adequate. In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical parts of the body was good and the car scored maximum points in this test.

In the more severe side pole impact, readings of rib compression indicated marginal chest protection, with good protection of other body areas.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.

An autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system is available on the 2020 Jeep Renegade. However, as this is an option, it was not tested as part of this assessment.

2020 Peugeot 2008 and 2020 Volkswagen Sharan - Crash Safety Tests Results

2020 Peugeot 2008 and 2020 Volkswagen Sharan - Crash Safety Tests Results

volkswagen cars   12/04/2019 01:07:00 PM

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Peugeot 2008 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Peugeot showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was rated as marginal for the neck of the driver and for the chest of both occupants.

In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in test.

In the more severe side pole test, chest protection was rated as adequate and that of other body areas as good.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The 2020 Peugeot 2008 has an autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system as standard equipment.

In tests of its functionality at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur, the system performed well.

2020 Volkswagen Sharan - Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Volkswagen Sharan remained stable in the frontal offset test.

Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Volkswagen showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good for the driver.

However, for the rear passenger, dummy readings indicated a marginal level of protection for the chest.

A penalty was also applied as a result of high shoulder belt forces and protection of the chest was rated as poor.

In the side barrier impact, all critical body areas were well protected and the 2020 Volkswagen Sharan scored maximum points in this test.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good.

However, the side door of the Sharan became detached during the test and the score was penalised for the risk of occupant ejection.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats indicated marginal whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed adequately in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur.

2020 Subaru Forester and 2020 Škoda Octavia - Crash Safety Tests Results

2020 Subaru Forester and 2020 Škoda Octavia - Crash Safety Tests Results

videos   12/04/2019 12:29:00 PM

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Subaru Forester remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Subaru showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both occupants, with the exception of the chest of the rear passenger, for which readings of compression indicated marginal protection.

In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in all test scenarios.

2020 Škoda Octavia - Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Škoda Octavia remained stable in the frontal offset test.

Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Škoda showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of the chest of the rear passenger was marginal but, otherwise, protection was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger.

In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this test.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was rated as marginal, based on dummy readings of rib compression, with good protection of other parts of the body.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection. The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur

2020 Audi Q7 and 2020 Renault Captur - Crash Safety Tests Results

2020 Audi Q7 and 2020 Renault Captur - Crash Safety Tests Results

videos   12/04/2019 11:32:00 AM

The passenger compartment of the 2020 Audi Q7 remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees
and femurs of both the driver and passenger.

Audi showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the chest was marginal for both driver and passenger.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, chest protection was again marginal for the rear passenger but other critical body areas were well or adequately protected, for both occupants.

In both the side barrier test and the pole impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the Audi Q7 scored maximum points in these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the front seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality against other vehicles at the low speeds, typical of city driving, at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in almost all test scenarios.

2020 Renault Captur Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the Renault Captur remained stable in the frontal offset test.

Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Renault showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

Protection was rated as good for all critical body areas for the passenger.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection was good or adequate for all critical body areas, both for the driver and the rear passenger.

In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this test.

Even in the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body regions was good.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision.

A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in most test scenarios.

2020 Tesla Model X and 2020 Porsche Taycan - Crash Safety Tests Results

2020 Tesla Model X and 2020 Porsche Taycan - Crash Safety Tests Results

videos   12/04/2019 10:50:00 AM

The stand-out performer of this round is undoubtedly Tesla’s Model X, scoring 94 percent for Safety Assist, the same as the Model 3 scored early this year.

The passenger compartment of the Model X remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the
knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Tesla showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection was rated as good for all critical body areas for the driver.

This was also the casein the the full-width rigid barrier test, and protection was good or adequate for the rear passenger. In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur, with collisions avoided in all test scenarios.

2020 Porsche Taycan Crash Safety Tests Results

The passenger compartment of the Taycan remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the
knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Porsche showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions.

In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both occupants, with the exception of the rear passenger's chest, for which dummy readings of compression indicated a marginal level of protection.

In the side barrier impact, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in this tests.

In the more severe side pole test, protection of the chest was adequate and that of other body areas was good.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated marginal protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated marginal whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur. However, the Taycan was not awarded the points for these tests as good dynamic performance in the front seats is a prerequisite for AEB scoring.

2020 Ford Mondeo and 2020 Ford Kuga - Crash Safety Tests Results

2020 Ford Mondeo and 2020 Ford Kuga - Crash Safety Tests Results

videos   12/04/2019 09:31:00 AM

The passenger compartment of the Mondeo remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection of all critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger.

In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many whiplash injuries occur.

2020 Ford Kuga crash tests results

The passenger compartment of the Kuga remained stable in the frontal offset test. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the
knees and femurs of the driver and passenger.

Ford showed that a similar level of protection would be provided to occupants of different sizes and to those sitting in different positions. Protection of the driver's chest and lower leg was rated as marginal. In the full-width rigid barrier test, protection the driver's chest was again marginal but that of all other critical body areas was good or adequate for both the driver and rear passenger.

In both the side barrier and the more severe side pole tests, protection of all critical body areas was good and the car scored full points in both of these tests.

Tests on the front seats and head restraints demonstrated good protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a rear-end collision. A geometric assessment of the rear seats also indicated good whiplash protection.

The standard-fit autonomous emergency braking (AEB) system performed well in tests of its functionality at the low speeds at which many
whiplash injuries occur

2020 Mazda CX-30 Small Off-Road Euro Ncap Crash tests video and test results

2020 Mazda CX-30 Small Off-Road Euro Ncap Crash tests video and test results

videos   11/13/2019 12:39:00 PM

The traveler compartment of the Mazda CX-30 stayed stable in the frontal balance test. Sham readings showed great insurance of the knees and femurs of both the driver and traveler.

Mazda demonstrated that a comparable degree of security would be given to tenants of

various sizes and to those sitting in various positions. In the full-width inflexible boundary test, insurance of both the driver and back traveler

was useful for all basic body zones, and the CX-30 scored greatest focuses in this test. Similarly, in both the side boundary sway and the

increasingly serious side post test the Mazda CX-30 scored most extreme focuses, with great security all-round. Tests on the front seats and head-limitations

exhibited great assurance against whiplash wounds in case of a backside crash. A geometric evaluation of the back seats too

shown great whiplash assurance. The standard-fit 'Shrewd Brake Support' (SBS) performed well in trial of its usefulness at the low

speeds, run of the mill of city driving, at which whiplash wounds frequently happen. With crashes maintained a strategic distance from in all test situations, the Mazda CX-30 scored full

focuses in this piece of the evaluation.

In the frontal counterbalance test, insurance of all basic body regions was great or satisfactory for the two fakers, except for the neck of the

multi year old, for which readings of ductile powers demonstrated minor insurance. In the side obstruction sway, insurance was useful for all basic

portions of the body and the Mazda CX-30 scored full focuses for kid tenant insurance in this test. The front traveler airbag can be crippled to

permit a rearward-confronting kid restriction to be utilized in that seating position. Clear data is given to the driver in regards to the status of

the airbag and the framework was compensated. The entirety of the limitation types for which the Mazda CX-30 is structured could be appropriately introduced and

suited in the vehicle.

The assurance offered to the leader of a struck person on foot was great over practically the entirety of the hat surface and satisfactory over a great part of the

rest. Great security was given to people on foot's legs by the guard and insurance of the pelvis was additionally evaluated as great at all test

areas. The self-governing crisis slowing mechanism ('Smart Brake Support') can distinguish helpless street clients like people on foot and

cyclists, just as different vehicles. In trial of its response to such street clients, the framework performed enough, with impacts maintained a strategic distance from or

alleviated in many situations.

2020 Mercedes-Benz GLB SUV Crash tests video and test results

2020 Mercedes-Benz GLB SUV Crash tests video and test results

videos   11/13/2019 11:57:00 AM

The traveler compartment of the Mercedes-Benz GLB stayed stable in the frontal counterbalance test. Sham readings showed great insurance of the knees and femurs of both the driver and traveler.

Mercedes-Benz indicated that a comparative degree of insurance would be given to inhabitants of

various sizes and to those sitting in various positions. In the full-width unbending boundary test, insurance of all basic body districts was great or

sufficient except for the neck of the driver, for which sham readings of pliable powers demonstrated a negligible degree of insurance. In

the side hindrance test, security of all basic body regions was great and the GLB scored most extreme focuses. In the more serious side shaft test,

sham readings of rib pressure demonstrated minor assurance for the chest, with other basic parts of the body being very much secured.

Tests on the front seats and head restrictions exhibited great assurance against whiplash wounds in case of a backside impact. A

geometric appraisal of the back seats additionally showed great whiplash insurance. The standard-fit independent crisis braking (AEB)

framework performed well in trial of its usefulness at the low speeds, run of the mill of city driving at which numerous whiplash wounds happen.

In the frontal balance test, readings of elastic powers showed feeble insurance of the neck of the 10-year sham. Something else, assurance of

basic body zones was useful for the two fakers. In the side hindrance test, security of all basic body regions was great or satisfactory. The

front traveler airbag is consequently debilitated when a rearward-confronting kid limitation is placed in that seating position. Tests demonstrated that

the framework worked powerfully and the framework was remunerated. The entirety of the kid restriction types for which the GLB is structured could be appropriately

introduced and obliged.

The GLB has a functioning, deployable cap. Sensors in the guard recognize when a person on foot has been struck and actuators lift the hood

surface to give more prominent freedom to the hardened structures in the motor compartment. Mercedes-Benz indicated that the framework worked

vigorously for various person on foot statures and over a wide scope of velocities, so tests were performed with the cap in the raised

position. Assurance was great or sufficient at practically all test areas on the cap. The guard gave great insurance to people on foot's

legs at all test positions. Nonetheless, the security gave to the pelvis zone was poor and the GLB scored no focuses in this piece of the

appraisal. The AEB framework performed well in tests both of its walker location and its reaction to cyclists, with crashes maintained a strategic distance from in

almost all test situations.

2020 Opel Corsa Euro Ncap Crash tests video and test results

2020 Opel Corsa Euro Ncap Crash tests video and test results

videos   11/13/2019 10:44:00 AM

The supermini section has progressively gone under weight as of late from expanding natural and wellbeing necessities and an adjustment in buyer hunger. Opel/Vauxhall's new Corsa, be that as it may, accomplishes four stars

much the same as the past age vehicle did against the prerequisites in 2014. The Corsa shares a lot of its underpinnings with the most recent Peugeot 208, which was additionally appraised as four stars not long ago.

Performing over the five-star necessities in three of Euro NCAP's four territories of appraisal, the Corsa just missed the top rating by a solitary rate point in Safety Assist.

The traveler compartment of the Corsa stayed stable in the frontal balance test. Sham readings demonstrated great assurance of the legs

what's more, femurs of both the driver and traveler. Opel/Vauxhall exhibited that a comparative degree of insurance would be given to tenants

of various sizes and to those sitting in various positions. In the full-width unbending boundary test, insurance of all basic body regions was great or

sufficient for the driver and back traveler. In the side hindrance sway, assurance of all basic body zones was great and the Corsa scored

most extreme focuses. Indeed, even in the more extreme side post sway, security of the chest was satisfactory and that of other body zones was great.

Tests on the front seats and head restrictions exhibited a peripheral degree of assurance. A geometric evaluation of the back seats

demonstrated great assurance. In any case, the back seat push was ineligible for scoring in light of the fact that the inside seat isn't furnished with a head

limitation. The standard-fit self-ruling crisis braking (AEB) framework performed well in trial of its usefulness at the low speeds,

normal of city driving, at which numerous whiplash wounds happen. Notwithstanding, the focuses for this piece of the appraisal were not granted as a

vehicle must perform well in the dynamic trial of the situate and head limitations to be qualified for the extra AEB focuses.