2020 Mercedes-Benz GLB SUV Crash tests video and test results

The traveler compartment of the Mercedes-Benz GLB stayed stable in the frontal counterbalance test. Sham readings showed great insurance of the knees and femurs of both the driver and traveler.

Mercedes-Benz indicated that a comparative degree of insurance would be given to inhabitants of

various sizes and to those sitting in various positions. In the full-width unbending boundary test, insurance of all basic body districts was great or

sufficient except for the neck of the driver, for which sham readings of pliable powers demonstrated a negligible degree of insurance. In

the side hindrance test, security of all basic body regions was great and the GLB scored most extreme focuses. In the more serious side shaft test,

sham readings of rib pressure demonstrated minor assurance for the chest, with other basic parts of the body being very much secured.

Tests on the front seats and head restrictions exhibited great assurance against whiplash wounds in case of a backside impact. A

geometric appraisal of the back seats additionally showed great whiplash insurance. The standard-fit independent crisis braking (AEB)

framework performed well in trial of its usefulness at the low speeds, run of the mill of city driving at which numerous whiplash wounds happen.

In the frontal balance test, readings of elastic powers showed feeble insurance of the neck of the 10-year sham. Something else, assurance of

basic body zones was useful for the two fakers. In the side hindrance test, security of all basic body regions was great or satisfactory. The

front traveler airbag is consequently debilitated when a rearward-confronting kid limitation is placed in that seating position. Tests demonstrated that

the framework worked powerfully and the framework was remunerated. The entirety of the kid restriction types for which the GLB is structured could be appropriately

introduced and obliged.

The GLB has a functioning, deployable cap. Sensors in the guard recognize when a person on foot has been struck and actuators lift the hood

surface to give more prominent freedom to the hardened structures in the motor compartment. Mercedes-Benz indicated that the framework worked

vigorously for various person on foot statures and over a wide scope of velocities, so tests were performed with the cap in the raised

position. Assurance was great or sufficient at practically all test areas on the cap. The guard gave great insurance to people on foot's

legs at all test positions. Nonetheless, the security gave to the pelvis zone was poor and the GLB scored no focuses in this piece of the

appraisal. The AEB framework performed well in tests both of its walker location and its reaction to cyclists, with crashes maintained a strategic distance from in

almost all test situations.